‘Rough sex’ as a defence for murder is grotesque victim-blaming

A vigil for Grace Millane held in Christchurch, brand brand brand New Zealand, in December 2018. Photograph: Mark Baker/AP

T he killer of Uk backpacker Grace Millane happens to be sentenced to life in jail in brand brand brand New Zealand. Millane’s mom, Gillian, informed her killer that is daughter’s “You have taken my daughter’s future and robbed us of many memories that people had been planning to produce. ”

The horrific murder of Millane, whom came across her killer (whom can not be known as for appropriate reasons) for a Tinder date, has concentrated attention from the increasing utilization of the “sex game gone wrong” defence by males whom kill females. It’s a defence that will simply be referred to as victim-blaming taken fully to its most grotesque extreme. Right right Here we now have more and more males blaming ladies when it comes to deadly physical physical violence committed against them, suggesting females can somehow consent for their very own fatalities (that is legitimately impossible) while claiming they by themselves can’t be held accountable. It’s time the employment of this defence stopped – for good.

The defence also positions men as hapless victims of women’s sexual demands in a twisted reversal. All things considered, how do it is their fault she wanted if he was just doing what? It contends males don’t understand that, for instance, strangling, beating and cutting a woman’s throat is not dangerous, and they also can’t be blamed.

But that’s nonsense. Millane’s killer strangled her for ten minutes. Whilst the sentencing judge explained, that’s not sex” that is“rough. It’s violence.

Read more